Tool Comparison · 2026

html2design
vs html.to.design

Both tools bring HTML into Figma — but they use completely different approaches. Both accept public URLs; their manual/private-source paths and output modes differ.

Direct Answer

html2design and html.to.design both bring webpages into Figma. html2design combines pasted/file HTML for local or private sources with direct public URL capture and Pixel or Editable output. html.to.design accepts public URLs in its plugin and offers a browser extension for private pages and specific browser states. Compare both on the same page rather than assuming either output is exact.

TL;DR — Pick Your Tool

Paste HTML

html2design

Paste HTML or
capture a URL.

Native Figma plugin with manual HTML/file import for local or private sources and direct public URL capture in Pixel or Editable mode.

  • ✓ No Chrome extension
  • ✓ Works with localhost & dev builds
  • ✓ Pixel or best-effort Editable output
  • ✓ $12/mo or $96/yr
Install from Figma Community →

html.to.design

Paste a URL or
capture browser state.

Figma plugin for public URL import, plus a Chromium browser extension for private pages, networks, and specific rendered states.

  • ~ Public URL import in the plugin
  • ~ Extension for private browser states
  • ~ No raw pasted-code path documented here
  • ~ Check current official plans

Feature-by-feature breakdown

Every row is based on publicly documented capabilities as of 2026.

Feature html2design html.to.design
Input Method
Accepts pasted HTML/CSS code ✓ ✗
Direct public URL capture ✓ ✓
Requires Chrome extension ✗ Optional for private states
Works with localhost / dev server ✓ Browser-dependent
Works behind authentication ✓ Session-dependent
Import from Storybook / component library ✓ If rendered in browser
Figma Output Quality
Produces native Figma layers ✓ ✓
Editable text for supported content Review source Review source
Flexbox geometry imported Best effort Best effort
Typography values imported Font-dependent Font-dependent
Setup & Access
Native Figma plugin ✓ Plugin + optional extension
Figma Community install ✓ ✓
Works in any browser (not just Chrome) ✓ Plugin; extension is Chromium-only
Pricing
Pricing model $12/mo · $96/yr Check official pricing
Published usage limits Manual + daily URL allowance Plan-dependent

✓ = fully supported  |  ✗ = not supported  |  "Partial" or "Varies" = limited support

Pros & Cons

An honest assessment of each tool's strengths and limitations.

html2design

Strengths

  • ✓ Paste/file input — no public URL required for manual import
  • ✓ No Chrome extension needed — works in Figma Desktop, Arc, Safari, any browser
  • ✓ Full localhost and behind-auth support for dev builds and Storybook
  • ✓ Browser measurements used for best-effort editable geometry
  • ✓ Published pricing and separate manual/URL workflows

Limitations

  • — Manual mode requires copying HTML/CSS or loading a file
  • — CSS animations are not replicated in Figma

html.to.design

Strengths

  • ✓ Direct public URL import in the Figma plugin
  • ✓ Browser extension for private pages and specific states
  • ✓ Editable webpage capture workflow

Limitations

  • — Private-state capture uses a Chromium extension
  • — No raw pasted-code path documented here
  • — Complex pages can require cleanup
  • — Current pricing and limits require verification

When to use each tool

The right choice depends on where your HTML lives and how you work.

Use html2design when…

  • You have HTML/CSS and want editable Figma layers from your code
  • You're working on localhost or a local dev server
  • You're importing a component from Storybook or a component library
  • Your page is behind authentication or not publicly accessible
  • You use Figma Desktop, Arc, or any browser other than Chrome
  • You're doing a developer handoff audit or legacy migration

Use html.to.design when…

  • You want to quickly snapshot a live public website from Chrome with one click
  • You're capturing a competitor's page or a reference design for inspiration
  • You don't have access to the source code of the page you want to import
  • You're already in Chrome and prefer a browser-native extension workflow

Can I use both?

Yes. html2design is better for your own code; html.to.design is better for capturing live sites you don't have code access to. For any work involving a codebase, component library, or dev server, html2design gives you more control and cleaner results.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between html2design and html.to.design? ↓
html2design combines pasted/file HTML for local or private sources with public URL capture and Pixel or Editable output. html.to.design accepts public URLs in its plugin and uses a browser extension for private pages or specific states. Compare both on the same source and viewport.
Does html.to.design work with localhost? ↓
html.to.design documents a Chromium extension for localhost, private networks, authenticated pages, and specific browser states. html2design uses copied rendered HTML for local/private sources. Browser permissions, cross-origin assets, fonts, and application state can affect either workflow.
Do I need a Chrome extension to use html2design? ↓
No. html2design runs inside Figma and supports pasted HTML plus public URL capture without an extension. html.to.design can also import public URLs in its plugin; its browser extension is used for private pages and specific states.
Which tool produces better Figma output? ↓
Output quality depends on the page. Use the same source and viewport, then compare text editability, layer hierarchy, fonts, wrapping, image crops, effects, and cleanup. Neither workflow should be assumed browser-identical without inspection.
How does html2design pricing compare to html.to.design? ↓
html2design currently offers a trial, then $12 monthly or $96 yearly. Check html.to.design's official pricing page for current plans and limits, then compare cost against the number and type of captures you need.
Can html2design replace html.to.design? ↓
It can replace some workflows, but not automatically every one. html2design is suited to pasted HTML plus public URL capture, while html.to.design also offers browser-extension capture for private states. Test both when authenticated state or browser-specific capture matters.

Explore more comparisons & guides

Compare Hub

All HTML to Figma Comparisons

Comparison

html2design vs Screenshot Tools

Comparison

html2design vs Anima

Comparison

html2design vs Zeplin

Guide

Complete HTML to Figma Guide

Blog

Top 5 HTML to Figma Tools Compared

Ready to import HTML into Figma?

Install HTML to Figma from the Figma Community and convert your first HTML/CSS without rebuilding every layer manually.

Install Free on Figma Community

Free to try · $12/mo to unlock all features

Want the full picture? Read the Complete Guide to HTML to Figma Conversion →

See all comparisons at the Compare hub →